One should sit amongs others with an open mind
even if those to your side have been branded a closed one
One should take suggestions and comments as a two-sided clause
and not be bound to the rigours of a dictatorship of preference

For he who is the dictator need not show his aggression
for once he has brainwashed his clique his agression is cast through them
For he who is a dictator need not acknowledge rivalry
for once he has brinwashed his clique such rivalry is quelled by them

But the quiet politician sits and waits with lips midway
not eager to ounce on the faults of the dictator
But the quiet politician simply focusses on duty
and the dictator focusses on power and so he shall fail

The quiet politician's approach to progress is a pebble thrown into a bucket brimmed with liquid
the movement of the ripples implicit of his approach, their successfull return implicit of his progress
The quiet politician simply sits, simply waits, simply leads even when following
and the dictator finds it difficult to transfer his fury and disappointment to such a silent entity

well who is to blame really? who is responsible for building the image of politics as a menacing mechanism of money laundering and free for alls. i know surely since they both entail the same name, many people would jump and say politicians. but hey is that really so? after all it is the people who empower them literally. it is the people that take money from them on the side for a vote, so therefore it is the people indirectly, if you may, that really shape the political atmosphere that they argue about. yes indeen it is a situation where the cooks say the food they prepared tastes bad. i am surely never going to dine at that restaurant in my life.

So who's the true Politician here?
Translated into English by: LorenzoHarewood

parents adorn their children when they see that they have gone through the test of time and when they see that they have acheived certain mildstones in their lives. moreso they feel accomplished when they see their children getting what they did not have the opportunity to get. in many ways and instances education is a pivotal entity in such upliftment.
However, one may me tempted to further analyse the educational system as one element of this experience is missing. " Our educational system of today teaches and guides us on how to fit into a network rather than create our own". it attempts to show us how to manage for someone else, or be managed by someone else rather than show us how to maintain a vital network that will uplift us at a similar rate as those who have already established their own. that type of education is not education. that i refer to as "intellectual segregation" as it seeks to mislead or redirect the ambition of the youth in the hopes of them becoming an animal of material fascination. this indeed goes to show that as much education as you may have, be i a degree or phd or master, " Book sense is noway on equal par to common sense".

while i adore the formation of youth ehterprises and specifically youth oriented governmental organizations, i must say that based on my observations, we have created a culure of "sayers" rather than "doers". the mere selection process for those who head some of these organizations has caused me to raise an eyebrow or two from time to time. but dont be misguided by my comments, it is not the posts that i am in conflict with. moreso i question the capability of some of their recipients. how can you hold a highly recognised leadership post, one of importance and of the highest possible significance to develoment within a specific parameter, and yet you do absolutely nothing but sit and smile. well i guess its up to people like us to make the change for them, even although such an engagement may result in them once again doing nothing and taking credit for it. that again is not my concern though, once the job is done.

i firmly beleive that the best way to involve the government into activities that they ought to be mindful of is to participate in what is called the "Politics of exclusion". in doing so, you ignore government agencies that have seemingly neglected your ambitions. try it and see! government will latch on to projects and programs at a far quicker rate if it has become a success on its own. although it may be a case of them wanting to brand your project, you keep focussed on th fact that they came to you and you didn't goto them. therefore the ball is always in your court and if you ever have to go at it alone again, i will not be an unusual situation. my approach to politics is as simple as that.